<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who&#8217;s been surfing where? The government wants to know</title>
	<atom:link href="http://debralegg.com/2009/11/10/whos-been-surfing-where-the-government-wants-to-know/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://debralegg.com/2009/11/10/whos-been-surfing-where-the-government-wants-to-know/</link>
	<description>9to5to9: A working mom&#039;s mad adventures in boy land</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:41:33 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Debra</title>
		<link>http://debralegg.com/2009/11/10/whos-been-surfing-where-the-government-wants-to-know/#comment-8458</link>
		<dc:creator>Debra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://debralegg.com/?p=7378#comment-8458</guid>
		<description>I think &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091013/0217456506.shtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;I found the case&lt;/a&gt;, and I still can&#039;t decide. The comments in question have been removed from the story, so I can&#039;t tell if they merely ticked off the politician (which wouldn&#039;t be libel) or if there were false statements (possibly libel but still no guarantee.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091013/0217456506.shtml" rel="nofollow">I found the case</a>, and I still can&#8217;t decide. The comments in question have been removed from the story, so I can&#8217;t tell if they merely ticked off the politician (which wouldn&#8217;t be libel) or if there were false statements (possibly libel but still no guarantee.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://debralegg.com/2009/11/10/whos-been-surfing-where-the-government-wants-to-know/#comment-8454</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://debralegg.com/?p=7378#comment-8454</guid>
		<description>It was because the anonymous commenter said something about a polician&#039;s kid.  She (the politician) wants to sue the anonymous commenter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was because the anonymous commenter said something about a polician&#8217;s kid.  She (the politician) wants to sue the anonymous commenter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debra</title>
		<link>http://debralegg.com/2009/11/10/whos-been-surfing-where-the-government-wants-to-know/#comment-8449</link>
		<dc:creator>Debra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://debralegg.com/?p=7378#comment-8449</guid>
		<description>I wasn&#039;t aware of the one in Illinois, Lisa. I&#039;m going to have to look that one up. I could see the anonymity being broken if the comment was libelous or illegal. But if it&#039;s just someone griping about the government ... that bugs me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wasn&#8217;t aware of the one in Illinois, Lisa. I&#8217;m going to have to look that one up. I could see the anonymity being broken if the comment was libelous or illegal. But if it&#8217;s just someone griping about the government &#8230; that bugs me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://debralegg.com/2009/11/10/whos-been-surfing-where-the-government-wants-to-know/#comment-8448</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://debralegg.com/?p=7378#comment-8448</guid>
		<description>Actually, this just happened here in IL.  The ISP was forced to name who left an anonymous comment of a newspaper site even though the anonymous person sued to stay anonymous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, this just happened here in IL.  The ISP was forced to name who left an anonymous comment of a newspaper site even though the anonymous person sued to stay anonymous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
